Ever since the 80s, at least some machines I have owned have run some Microsoft product - it was a matter of necessity in the 1980s for desktop publishing if you didn't have the required startup capital for a Mac, and - perhaps sadly - it had been the most cost effective solution prior to the advent of Linux.
As a sidenote, while everyone waxes poetic about Apples - and they are great machines - they have been and continue to be horribly overpriced for the larger market. In my book - not an Apple Book - Apple's greatest mistake has been in not finding the middle ground between their price/performance and that of the PC market. When I see an Apple machine, I'm torn between thinking of a person or company that is willing to spend money on a good product and thinking of a person or company that has more money that brains. Stick that in your iPod's receptacle.
And I like Linux - mainly because of it's no nonsense approach to computing as compared to Microsoft's approach. But since I was still trying to make a living with Information Technology, I had to stay familiar with Microsoft. It's just too large of a market to ignore, and frankly - Microsoft is good for IT people. When Microsoft screws up, IT people get paid - and IT people have been getting paid a lot over the last 20 years. Too much, maybe, and that bubble is popping if it hasn't already: I cannot substantiate it, but I believe that there are more power users in the world than there are people who work in fast food. And it's a matter of time before the pay reflects that.
So now, as I'm semi-retired from IT, the last crash of a hard drive - ANOTHER Seagate Barracuda 7200 (I'm unlikely to buy any other Seagate products for a while) - I don't need to stay in touch with the hokey-pokey proprietary folks in Washington, collectively known as Microsoft.
Recent comments